I REALLY DON'T CARE

So Glenn Gordon had a lot of good points in his article, but i would still not agree with him. I'm 99.9% okay with animal testing!

If we didn't have animal testing then where would we all be right now? PROBABLY DISEASED AND DYING. Well maybe. I really don't understand what he meant by testing on dead people. How are scientists gonna do that? "Oh let me just infect this dead tissue with mold and see how the white blood cells are gonna fight it off! Wait, THE BODY'S CELLS ARE DEAD." Even if they find some "good" way to do that on dead people I probably still wouldn't care. I'm actually whatevers about all of this.

Okay sure animals have feelings but I mean they're already for people's pleasure anyway by being pets. And the mice; well why don't you make an article about mice being sold to snake owners to feed thier snakes?! HUH?! Yeah, there's something you might find interesting since every little unnessesary arguement gives you the urge to write an article against it. They don't have souls anyway so if they die then they just die.

Then Glenn says we treat animals as an inferrior species, or something like that. Well sorry but I don't see fish with a presidant or dogs who pay taxes or rats who go to school for an education. Um, yeah. They are inferrior compared to us.

And apperantly using animals is "incredibly costly". I don't know about you but I'd pay $1,000,000,000,000 to help find a cure for cancer if I had the money. Plus don't scientists get grants and stuff? I'm pretty sure they do! Plus the US is in debt anyway so #YOLO! Haha, just kidding. But seriously, if you need to pay for food for the snimals it wouln't be much of a big deal cause you know why?! BECAUSE THEY ARE LIKELY TO DIE SOONER ANYWAY. [:

In conclusion, I believe it's okay to test on animals. It's better for humans annnnnnnnnnnnnd... well yeah! Glenn, you had good points but I think we all know that deep inside I'm right. [:

photo credit